Across the Board
Should Elon Musk Get a Raise?
The extreme case of a problematic star performer who wants more
“For Elon Musk’s bosses at Tesla, the board of directors, it can be hard to know which man might show up for work…That’s why the past few weeks might well live on as a business-school case study on the complexity of managing a superstar talent who has succeeded with maverick ways but also, for some, can go too far. Just as it isn’t easy for a manager to course-correct a star performer who gets out of line, a board can struggle to rein in a celebrity CEO, especially if everyone is enjoying the company’s stock performance that papers over troubling signs. At present, Musk directly holds 13% of Tesla shares, or about 21% if including unexercised options…Now, he’s publicly asking for 25%, to give him more voting power in corporate matters.” THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Andy Jassy: AI is Companies’ Biggest Risk and Opportunity in 2024
The present day is “three steps into a marathon”
“Companies around the world are all facing an interesting dilemma in 2024, according to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy: their biggest problems and solutions might be one and the same. ‘The opportunity and risk is pretty similar in that there is this wildly transformative, disruptive technology in generative AI that you can’t get through any conversation without talking about,’ Jassy says…’I just see companies really battling with prioritization between are they better off continuing with that modernization of their technology platform, or should they spend all their new engineering resources on generative AI,’ Jassy says. But it’s not as simple as picking a single option, he adds. If companies don’t have their technology infrastructure in place, it’s going to be hard for them to be successful in AI.” FORTUNE
Exxon Sues to Block Climate Proposal from Shareholder Voting
Says the proposal to cut emissions faster would not generate shareholder value
“Exxon Mobil is suing two activist investors to prevent their proposal calling for emissions cuts at the oil giant from going to a vote of shareholders. In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on Sunday, Exxon accused the investors, Arjuna Capital and Follow This, of abusing the process for proposing shareholder votes to advance their priorities with votes ‘calculated to diminish the company’s existing business.’ Arjuna filed a proposal in December for a nonbinding resolution that urged Exxon to accelerate its plans to reduce its carbon emissions and expand the scope of the emissions it measures to include its suppliers and customers. Follow This joined in support of the proposal shortly thereafter, according to the complaint. The proposal ‘does not seek to improve ExxonMobil’s economic performance or create shareholder value,’ Exxon said in the complaint, but is instead ‘constraining and micromanaging’ the company’s operations.” THE NEW YORK TIMES
Navigating ESG Fatigue in Shareholder Voting
The 2023 proxy season was marked by a record number of shareholder proposals
“In 2023, the volume of shareholder proposals increased yet again. In the first half of 2023, shareholders filed 836 proposals at Russell 3000 companies, compared to 801 in the first half of 2022. That’s more than the 792 proposals filed in all of 2021. Additionally, a larger percentage of proposals went to a vote in the 2023 proxy season (70% compared to 67% in 2022) and a smaller share was withdrawn (20% in 2023 compared to 24% in 2022), indicating that proponents became less willing to negotiate with companies…The vast majority of governance shareholder proposals (77%) and executive compensation proposals (76%) are filed by individuals. By contrast, only 12% of E&S proposals are filed by individuals.” HARVARD LAW SCHOOL FORUM ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Addressing Climate Governance at the Board Level
Managing evolving climate risks requires new forms of thinking and culture
“The evolving business landscape, marked by heightened natural hazard risks causing more frequent interruptions and damage, underscores the imperative for board action. Societal expectations are also aligning more closely with a lower carbon economy, driven by customers, investors, and regulators. The current trajectory suggests an urgent need to transition to a lower carbon state, with the economy facing a trade-off between higher transition risks now or increased future physical risks due to delayed action. In this context, climate is seen as a critical business risk requiring management and navigation by board directors.” INSURANCE BUSINESS
Macy’s Rejects Takeover Bid but Remains Open to Opportunities
Arkhouse Management and Brigade Capital are behind unsolicited $5.8B deal
“Macy’s rejected a $5.8 billion takeover bid late Sunday that valued the struggling department store chain at roughly 20 percent above its closing share price on Friday, but suggested it was “open to opportunities…With a potential hostile bid looming, questions are rising over how Arkhouse and Brigade could pull off a deal and whether additional suitors could appear, potentially setting off a bidding war. In a statement released Sunday night, Macy’s board questioned whether the investment firms had the money to finance the deal, which it said “lacks compelling value.” It noted that the bid had been accompanied by a letter with “numerous” untraditional stipulations.” THE NEW YORK TIMES
Choice Hotels Nominates Board in Hostile Wyndham Bid
Slate includes former Choice director and hospitality, real estate leaders
“Choice Hotels International pressed ahead with its $8 billion hostile bid for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts on Monday by nominating a slate of directors to replace Wyndham's eight-member board. It is Choice's latest attempt to break a stalemate after trying for most of the last year to negotiate a deal with Wyndham, which has rebuffed the bid as low-premium and fraught with antitrust risk. Wyndham has also raised concerns about the combined company carrying too much debt and a slowdown in Choice's business…Choice said its slate of nominees includes hospitality industry veteran Jay Shah, who currently serves on the board of private equity-backed HHM Hotels; Susan Schnabel, founder of aPriori Capital Partners which advises private equity on leveraged buyouts; James Nelson, CEO of real estate investment trust Global Net Lease; and Fiona Dias, who served on Choice's board from 2004 to 2012.” REUTERS