Across the Board
Goldman Sachs Succession Plan: Will the Parties Be Willing?
As the board reportedly weighs a transition that could put John Waldron in the CEO role and David Solomon in the executive chair seat, observers suggest its likelihood may come down to timing
“Goldman Sachs is on top of Wall Street right now, advising on more than $1 trillion in merger deals and generating more than $12 billion in equities revenue in the first six months of the year alone. Those records make it all the more striking that Goldman’s board has reportedly discussed replacing CEO David Solomon, 64, with president John Waldron, 57, as early as next year. The succession plan, which would elevate Solomon to executive chairman, could be voted on by the bank’s board in coming months…. But there’s a key risk facing Goldman: Solomon may not be ready to give up his seat, and Waldron may not be willing to wait for it indefinitely. Solomon has gotten Goldman back on track after an ill-fated foray into consumer banking earlier in his tenure…. If Solomon decides he wants to remain CEO amid an AI boom that he believes is in its early innings, Waldron may tire of waiting for the crown. After all, Waldron, Goldman’s president and chief operating officer, had reportedly been in discussions for leadership roles at alternative asset managers Apollo and Carlyle." CNBC
Sooner is Better to Evaluate a New CEO
While boards may want to give a new leader time in the seat, early feedback, or recognition of a mismatch, is critical
“There’s a question several corporate boards should be asking themselves about now. Or soon—sooner than they think…. ‘How do we know we got it right?’ The list of companies that have ushered in new CEOs in planned transitions this year includes Walmart, Disney, Coca-Cola, and Apple. New CEOs will take control at Adobe and Best Buy in the coming weeks. Stanislav Shekshnia, a professor at the French business school INSEAD, argues that the right time for all of these companies to assess whether they picked the best candidate is about six to 12 months into the CEOs’ tenures, which is several years before most boards do so, he says. Asking the question so early may not seem entirely fair—why not give CEOs some time to make progress? But waiting too long when there’s a mismatch can quickly become more expensive and disruptive than restarting the process, the professor suggests. He urges boards to review a few relatively immediate outcomes that may reveal whether the board needs to intervene and shore up support for the newcomer or look for an alternative leader.” WALL STREET JOURNAL
The Surprises that New CEOs Contend With
Former Harvard Business School Dean Nitin Nohria explores the unexpected realities of taking the top job
“[A] catalog of ‘surprises’ that face new CEOs: … [1]The CEO is always in the spotlight. ‘In every setting—formal or informal, inside or outside the company—their words, actions, tone and body language are studied and interpreted. They are never off the record and always sending a message, whether they intend to or not.’ [2] The CEO can’t run the company. ‘They must transition from direct leadership to indirect influence, and they must use their power to ensure that others can manage the company consistently and at scale.’ [3] Their immense authority can create lasting damage. ‘They can overrule decisions, reassign resources and reshape teams at will. But there is a price to pay for exercising that authority too frequently or too forcefully.’ [4] They often find it hard to know what is going on. ‘As one CEO put it, ‘The higher you rise, the more truth bends around you.’ This performative information flow is sometimes called ‘success theater.’’” WALL STREET JOURNAL
The Board Tried to Remove the CEO. He Replaced the Board.
Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg has rebuilt the company’s board just weeks after its previous directors tried, and failed, to oust him
“Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg has rebuilt the company’s board just weeks after its previous directors tried, and failed, to oust him…. The new board is the latest twist in an internal governance fight at Automattic, the parent company of WordPress.com, Tumblr, WooCommerce, and others. Earlier this month, the previous board voted to place Mullenweg on leave in an attempt to remove him from the board, only to have the CEO retake control just 33 hours later and remove or accept the resignations of the directors who were involved…. Automattic’s original board had voted to put Mullenweg on paid leave, but he took back control of the company, letting go of those involved in what he described on X as a ‘coup attempt.’ To replace the board, Mullenweg leveraged his voting shares — he controls 84% of the vote.” TECH CRUNCH
Oracle’s AI Bet Puts Board Composition in Focus
As the company commits billions to AI infrastructure, the long-standing tenure of many of its directors is drawing attention
“When Oracle shareholders vote on November 18, they will be asked to elect 13 directors. The slate includes an 82-year-old founder who has sat on the board since 1977 and a 40-year-old CEO who joined it a year ago. Between them sits Safra Catz, 64, who ran the company for 11 years before stepping aside in September 2025, along with a group whose profiles, laid out in the company's proxy statement, raise a question the filing answers only indirectly: What kind of board should oversee a company betting its future on cloud infrastructure and artificial intelligence? The question has sharper edges than it did a year ago. Oracle's shares have fallen roughly 58% since the day its new CEOs were named, from $328.15 to about $137.10. The board's own answer, spread across the filing, is that experience is an asset…. Four directors are 79 or older: Larry Ellison, 82; Michael Boskin, 81; Jeffrey Henley, 81; and Jeffrey Berg, 79. All four joined the board by 1997, and together they represent roughly 140 years of service….” CTECH
2026 Board Recruitment Favors Retired CEOs and Experienced Directors
A majority of new S&P appointments are retired individuals, with some 59% bringing CEO or financial experience, while the number of first-time public company directors has declined
“S&P 500 boards appointed 364 new independent directors in 2026, out of a total of 5,204 — the lowest number of new directors since 2016. Overall turnover remains low, declining from 0.8 new directors per board last year to 0.7 in 2026. In previous years, declines in director appointments generally mirrored the number of directors leaving boards. For example, 374 directors departed S&P 500 boards in 2024, matching the number of new director appointments in 2025. That pattern did not continue in 2026: 418 directors left boards last year, 15% higher than this year’s appointments…. This year, 37% of all new directors are CEOs, an increase of seven percentage points from last year. This is the highest share since a peak of 42% in 2012. Overall, 64% of incoming directors bring CEO or financial experience, up from 59% in 2025. Retired individuals again represent the majority of appointments…. First-time public company directors account for 24% of the class of 2026, down from 31% last year and 34% in 2024. Most (62%) are actively employed, compared with 40% of directors with prior public board service.” HARVARD LAW SCHOOL FORUM ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Vail Resorts Faces a Board Challenge
Activist investor Oasis is seeking four seats as it pushes for changes to costs, guest experience and capital allocation
“For Vail Resorts, this activist campaign plugs straight into the existing Narrative about execution risk and cost discipline. Oasis is zeroing in on guest experience, pricing and use of hospitality assets…. Investors now have a clearer test of whether governance and board composition will support those efficiency and experience goals or dilute them. The activism also intersects with flagged risks around financial resilience, including interest cover and dividend sustainability, since any shift in capital spending or payout policy will run through the board…. The practical waypoint to watch next is Vail Resorts' 2026 Annual Meeting, where shareholders vote on Oasis's four nominees. That result, and any board level commitments on cost efficiencies or guest experience metrics around that time, will show how much this challenge actually reshapes the long term story.” YAHOO FINANCE
|
|