Across the Board
Political Influence in Proxy Adviser Recommendations Called Into Question
The Texas senator is seeking answers from the two influential proxy advisory firms after they opposed corporate relocations to Texas, questioning whether their recommendations prioritized politics over investors’ financial interests
“Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz is questioning whether investor recommendations by Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. were tainted by political considerations after they opposed corporate moves to Texas. Cruz, a Texas Republican, wrote in letters to the companies seen by Bloomberg that he was concerned each company might be ‘prioritizing political objectives over the best financial interests of its clients.’ He also asked if they are ‘engaging in anti-competitive conduct or unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of federal antitrust or consumer protection laws.’” BLOOMBERG
Failed Succession Planning Unravels Vaunted Wall Street Behemoth
The collapse of a planned leadership transition, coupled with partner defections and unsuccessful merger efforts, exposed deeper strategic weaknesses at the once-powerful firm
“The turmoil at Weil, Gotshal & Manges has led its leaders to wind down the law firm. They took the steps as the firm hemorrhaged top lawyers and had no clear succession plan after its incoming chair declined to step into the role. Such a fall is extraordinary for a firm with some 1,200 lawyers worldwide and had been among the most well-regarded and profitable in the industry…. The roots of the crisis at Weil date back more than a decade. The firm raked in business during the chaotic aftermath of the 2008-09 financial crisis but failed to reinvest those profits and even cut lawyers when many of its competitors were in growth mode. It has fallen behind industry leaders in head count, revenue and profit—leaving it vulnerable to poaching from rival firms. Weil has pushed hard in the past year or so to grow, seeking a firm with which to merge and amping up efforts to lure new partners. Some firm insiders say there was a power struggle between influential partners who wanted to grow to compete with mega-firm rivals and others who wanted to remain smaller.” WALL STREET JOURNAL
Governing in an Age of Disruption: How Boards Are Adapting to New Realities
Amid accelerating technological change, geopolitical volatility and growing regulatory complexity, corporate directors are reassessing the expertise, priorities and practices needed for effective governance
“Across 42 interviews with board directors in the U.S., UK and Canada, a consistent description emerged of the markets their companies are navigating. Faster, more interconnected, less patient. A corresponding analysis of board composition data over 15 years for the U.S. S&P 500, UK FTSE 100 and Canadian TSX 60 companies revealed how boards have been evolving and adapting to new pressures…. Boards continue to build capability around new demands. Risk and governance expertise is now credited to about half of U.S. and Canadian directors, while technology and sustainability are among the other areas showing significant gains. Directors acknowledge the squeeze on strategy time. As oversight demands squeeze strategy time, boards are becoming more disciplined about how they work, tightening agendas and materials, using committees more deliberately and shifting appropriate work between meetings to preserve space for strategic discussion.” HARVARD LAW SCHOOL FORUM ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
DoorDash Makes $17 Billion Bet on Instacart to Expand Delivery Dominance
The acquisition would unite leading restaurant and grocery delivery platforms, extending DoorDash’s reach as competition intensifies and the industry moves toward consolidation
“DoorDash said on Thursday that it had agreed to buy Instacart for $17 billion, in a deal that would fold the nation’s dominant grocery delivery app into the company that already controls most of America’s restaurant takeout orders. Together, the companies would dominate the business of bringing dinner and groceries to Americans’ doors. Under the terms of the agreement, Instacart shareholders would receive $65 per share, mostly in cash, 11 percent over the company’s closing price on Wednesday. The deal has been approved by both companies’ boards…. The takeover is DoorDash’s largest to date, surpassing its roughly $8 billion buyout of Finnish food-delivery company Wolt and its acquisition of Deliveroo, a British rival. It was also a striking turn for Instacart, which was valued at $39 billion by private investors during the pandemic grocery boom.” NEW YORK TIMES
Peltz Pushes to Take Wendy’s Private, Raising the Stakes for Its Board
With Trian already holding a significant ownership stake and a seat on the board, the longtime investor argues that a private ownership structure offers a better path to revitalizing the struggling company
“Nelson Peltz’s hedge fund Trian Fund Management offered to buy Wendy’s for around $1.4 billion Wednesday, arguing that the struggling fast-food chain is ‘at a critical juncture’ and would be better off as a private company…. The restaurant operator Flynn Group and the investment firms BlueFive Capital and Sixth Street Partners are working with Trian. Wendy’s had a market value of roughly $1.2 billion as of Tuesday’s close…. The fast-food company’s stock had been down roughly 70% over the past five years after operational missteps weighed on traffic and pressured earnings…. Peltz has long been a major investor in the chain. His firm currently holds a roughly 16% stake, along with related parties, and continues to have a board presence. His son, Bradley, sits on its board…” WALL STREET JOURNAL
|
|