Governance in the Time of Rockets, AI, Activists ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  
View in browser

5/28/26 – Issue 11.21 – Your weekly news on all things board. 

Directors Domain Header 22-1

Elon Musk has always pushed the envelope: the all-electric, sporty Roadster broke barriers in 2003, then came reusable rockets, and now another mind-bendingly audacious idea on the journey to colonizing Mars, rewriting the rules of corporate governance for what could become the largest IPO in history. SpaceX’s proposed governance structure would give Musk near-total voting control, severely limit or eliminate shareholder influence and lawsuits, avoid a majority-independent board, and even allow him to vote shares he has not yet been awarded. The message is hard to miss: Potential investors are welcome to join Elon for a ride on his financial rocket ship, but they shouldn’t expect guardrails or oversight. While we’ve seen the founder-centric, dual-class share structure before, most notably at Facebook/Meta, where Mark Zuckerberg holds more than 50% of the voting power, SpaceX is making a hyper-assertive play to dismiss governance norms in favor of near-total founder control. Meanwhile, the AI economy is pushing boards into entirely new territory. Observers suggest Anthropic’s latest cyber tools will ultimately create more visibility into enterprise risk than some companies are operationally prepared to manage—and create a whole new way of thinking about cyber oversight. Nvidia’s massive Taiwan investment highlights how dependent the future of AI has become on fragile geopolitical arrangements. In China, courts are signaling that aggressive AI adoption must be balanced by social stability and worker protections. Despite the rapid technological and social changes, this week also offered a reminder that old-fashioned governance failures can still destabilize a global company overnight, as BP ousts its chair over allegations of misconduct. Finally, activist investors continue to make their presence felt, with Lululemon founder Chip Wilson securing two board seats after a very vocal pressure campaign, Elliott Management winning representation at Synopsys, and GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen attempting to turn public pressure into a takeover weapon in his pursuit of eBay.

 

In the Spotlight

 

Musk Seeks Near-Total Control of a Public Space-X

The proposed governance structure resembles a system designed not to oversee leadership but to ensure undiluted power

 

“Elon Musk holds so much power at SpaceX that it is nearly impossible to fire him or make other significant corporate changes without his support. That isn’t going to change for investors in the company’s initial public offering. Musk will have an unprecedented level of control at a public company of its size, which is expected to reach a valuation of at least $1.5 trillion. [Musk] controls roughly 85% of the voting power…. Individual investors will be able to buy Class A shares, which have just one vote apiece. Meanwhile, Class B shares carry 10 votes for each share owned…. Musk holds around 94% of Class B shares. Individual investors will be able to buy Class A shares, which will have just one vote apiece. Meanwhile, Class B shares carry 10 votes for each share owned…. Musk holds around 94% of Class B shares…. There are restrictions that could make it virtually impossible for most shareholders to sue the company. The first is a provision allowed under the state law of Texas, where SpaceX is legally based, that prevents lawsuits from shareholders collectively representing less than 3% of the stock issued. The second is an arbitration requirement that restricts investors from banding together to file class-action suits.” WALL STREET JOURNAL

 

Prospectus Suggests Musk Can Vote Shares He Has Yet to Earn

SpaceX’s latest governance arrangements suggest the company’s oversight structure revolves around a single individual

 

“In January, SpaceX granted Elon Musk…a pay package that eventually totaled 1.3 billion restricted shares. The award was contingent on the rocket company’s establishing a colony on Mars with one million inhabitants and launching high-powered data centers into space. Musk has not achieved those goals. Even so, he can vote those 1.3 billion shares in shareholder decisions, according to SpaceX’s offering prospectus.… In other words, the company is allowing Musk to vote with shares he has not yet earned.….’ Among the atypical arrangements, SpaceX does not plan to have the majority of its board be independent directors. And its governing documents say any shareholder claims under federal securities law must be resolved through arbitration. All of these moves appear to benefit one person: Mr. Musk.” NEW YORK TIMES


From Boardspan this Week:

 

 How Board Leadership Shapes Performance 

How board chairs and lead directors influence oversight, decision-making, and long-term board effectiveness

 

Strong board leadership shapes how effectively boards govern, engage with management, and navigate complexity. At its best, it fosters candid dialogue, sound judgment, and alignment around long-term priorities. Explore Boardspan’s Board Leadership hub for perspectives on board chairs, lead directors, leadership transitions, and the boardroom dynamics that influence board effectiveness.

Visit the Board Leadership Hub

Across the Board

 

AI-enabled Cyber Tools Require a Rethink of Governance

Anthropic’s new offerings underscore a larger reality: Boards can’t treat cybersecurity as a static governance issue but a constantly evolving technological contest

 

“Anthropic’s launch of Claude Mythos Preview and Project Glasswing marks an important development in AI-enabled vulnerability discovery and cybersecurity. Providing Mythos to strategically and systemically important organizations creates a temporary shift in the balance of power between attackers and defenders. For corporate boards, the significance is not merely technical. AI-enabled vulnerability discovery may give defenders a temporary tactical advantage, but the real governance question is whether management can convert better visibility, and the ability to see latent risk into prioritized remediation, stronger prevention, and durable cyber resilience. Cyber risk differs from many enterprise risks because it is adversarial, asymmetric, highly systemic in nature, and it possesses different temporal and scale dynamics. This makes cybersecurity oversight in the boardroom less about governing and managing a static control environment and more about overseeing a real-time active contest where the rules regularly change, between enterprise resilience and adversarial capability, innovation and persistence. The uncomfortable truth is that AI-enabled vulnerability discovery will expose more of the enterprise’s hidden cyber risk than many organizations or boards are prepared for. That visibility will be disruptive, but valuable.” HARVARD LAW SCHOOL FORUM ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Job Preservation Beats AI In Chinese Court

China is signaling that companies pursuing AI efficiency at scale must also preserve employment, stability, and social

 

“When a Chinese court ruled late last month that a tech company had illegally laid off a worker after replacing him with artificial intelligence software, it delivered an implicit warning to other employers. ‘The development of artificial intelligence technology should be applied to liberating labor, promoting employment and improving people’s livelihood,’ the Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court wrote. ‘Labor law allows employers to undertake technological changes and upgrade their operations, but it should also take into account the protection of workers’ legitimate rights and interests.’ The case…underscores how Beijing is contending with the need to balance its ambitions for the widespread use of A.I. with the unemployment that might accompany it. China has invested billions to become an artificial intelligence superpower and raced to integrate the technology across a broad range of industries. But those aspirations have run headlong into a growing political problem: anxiety over the workers who could be displaced by the realization of Beijing’s technological drive. In China, the debate has become especially acute amid a sluggish economy and persistently high youth unemployment…. More than 200 million workers have already been pushed into low-paying, demanding jobs in the gig economy. Companies that benefit from technology must, at the same time, adopt “social responsibilities” and protect worker rights…” WALL STREET JOURNAL

 

The AI Empire Strikes East

Nvidia’s enormous Taiwan investment reflects how deeply the future of artificial intelligence now depends on a fragile global supply chain

 

“Nvidia’s CEO said on Wednesday the ​chip company plans to invest around $150 billion a year in Taiwan, terming it the ‘epicentre’ of the AI revolution ‌and predicting it will be the world's tech manufacturing hub for a long time. The project will break ground this year and aims to be operational ​in 2030…. The Taiwan headquarters will bring Nvidia closer to TSMC, the world's largest contract chipmaker, which makes many of ​the advanced semiconductors powering the trend towards AI and is a major supplier to the U.S. tech giant. Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia said, ‘Taiwan is the epicentre of the AI revolution. This is where the chips come, ​packaging comes, this is where the systems are made, this is where AI supercomputers were created. The number of partners we work with here in ‌Taiwan, incredible.’ Last week, Nvidia aimed to assure investors that it can keep up its blockbuster ​growth with the help of a broad base of customers and that new products will help it beat the $1 trillion in sales it has forecast for its flagship ​AI chips.” REUTERS

 

BP Chairman Accused of Bullying Employees, Mishandling Information

The board ousted its chair following allegations of misconduct, leaving the oil company seeking its fourth chair since 2023

 

“BP has removed its chairman, Albert Manifold, after the oil major’s board was told that he was verbally abusive and bullying toward employees, and had mishandled company information….The London-based company said Tuesday that its board had unanimously decided that Manifold should no longer serve as chair, and that he would depart immediately. ‘The board has been surprised and disappointed to learn of governance oversight and conduct issues it deems unacceptable and has taken decisive action’…. Concerns about Manifold’s abusive behavior relate to conduct toward both junior and senior employees…. the board believed that Manifold shared privileged information with people who weren’t supposed to have it and withheld information from the board. Manifold’s abrupt departure adds to the leadership turmoil in recent years….The company has now had three chief executives and three chairmen since 2023. Before Tuesday’s disclosure, BP’s shares were riding the wave of higher energy prices sparked by the Iran war and had outperformed other major oil companies.” WALL STREET JOURNAL

 

Lululemon Agrees to Founder’s Choice of Two New Directors

The athleisure-maker avoids a shareholder showdown, but Chip Wilson’s feisty campaign won him meaningful influence over the company’s future

 

“It is over a decade since Chip Wilson, founder of Lululemon, suggested that some customers really did not belong in his company’s garments. This was, it’s fair to say, the wrong response to complaints that Lululemon’s yoga pants were too sheer. Yet Wilson has not stopped having opinions — or thinking he has the solution to the group’s problems. The athleisure mogul stepped down from Lululemon in 2013, but still owns 9 per cent of its stock. He has also spent recent months battling the company to put his three suggestions for directors on the board. On Wednesday, Lululemon agreed to admit two of those candidates. In return, Wilson must stop bad-mouthing the company for 18 months.” FINANCIAL TIMES

 

Synopsis to Give Board Seat to Elliott Management

Synopsys’ deal with Elliott highlights how activist investors are increasingly targeting the infrastructure companies powering the AI boom

 

“Chip design software maker ​Synopsys has reached an agreement with activist investor Elliott Investment Management that will give one board ‌seat to the activist investor's managing partner Jesse Cohn, the company said on Wednesday. The board is being expanded to 11 members with the appointment of Cohn, who will also join the board's corporate governance and nominating committee, it added. Elliott, which has a history of successful investments at technology and semiconductor companies, pushed the company to improve ​its margins, and Synopsys' stock price has climbed roughly 20% since Elliott's involvement became public.” REUTERS


Could GameStop Really Take Over eBay?

Ryan Cohen’s escalating campaign against eBay underscores how public pressure itself has become a governance weapon

 

 “GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen shared few details when he said he would do ‘whatever we need to do’ to buy eBay after the e-commerce company rejected his $56 billion unsolicited takeover bid….Cohen offered eBay's board $125 a share as well as his services ​as CEO. Cohen raised more questions on Wall Street with vague answers in recent interviews to questions about how he would pay for eBay, a company nearly five times the size of his own. Despite the resounding refusal from eBay's board, bankers, investors, lawyers and industry analysts say Cohen has an unlikely, but not impossible, path for wresting control of eBay. One option for Cohen…would be to bypass eBay's board ​by approaching shareholders with an offer to buy them out at a premium through a so-called tender offer…. While tender offers are relatively rare, they can make a lot of noise. GameStop would have to convince eBay's largest institutional investors including Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street…. Together the three own more than 22% of eBay…. Analysts say it is highly unlikely these firms would jump to approve a hostile takeover bid.” REUTERS 

    Seat at the Table

    • Constellation Brands welcomes to its board Morgan Flatley, EVP, Global Chief Marketing Officer and New Business Ventures for McDonald’s Corporation

    • Biotech company Illumina, Inc. appoints to its board David King, former Executive Chair and CEO of LabCorp

    • McCormick appoints to its board Cindy Hoots, former Chief Digital Officer & CIO, AstraZeneca

    • Infrastructure services company Quanta Services announces the appointment of Joseph Kim, President, CEO and director for Sunoco GP LLC

    • Biopharmaceutical company Verastem Oncology, elects to its board Michael Bailey, President and CEO for AVEO Pharmaceuticals

    • AI infrastructure company Core Scientific appoints to its board Steve Smith, CEO of Zayo Group

    LinkedIn
    Facebook

    About Boardspan
    Boardspan helps boards raise the bar on their critical governance mandates by combining cutting edge digital capabilities with high-touch consulting services. They are leaders in board assessments, individual director & CEO evaluations, board succession strategy & search, skills & composition analyses, and bespoke advisory work. Boardspan’s focus is entirely on boards, delivering deep experience, objectivity, an analytical orientation, and insight-driven recommendations. Boardspan works with public, private and non-profit organizations across all verticals including consumer, healthcare, financial services, technology, industrials and non-profit. Specific clients include Archer Daniels Midland, Autodesk, Blue Shield (CA), Boston Beer Company, Colgate-Palmolive, e.l.f. Beauty, HubSpot, Ingersoll Rand, KKR, Lam Research, the PGA, Roblox, Salesforce, the USOPC, and scores more.

    Copyright © 2026 Boardspan. All rights reserved.

    Boardspan updates its Privacy Policy in response to evolving best practices and regulatory requirements, such as GDPR. We value transparency and like to share these policies for use of our website and other information we offer.

    Boardspan, 3000 El Camino Real, Bldg. 4 Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA

    Unsubscribe Manage preferences